Mars Entry Trajectory Planning with Range Discretization and Successive Convexification

No AccessEngineering NotesMars Entry Trajectory Planning with Range Discretization and Successive ConvexificationXu Liu, Shuang Li Ming XinXu LiuNanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 211106 Nanjing, People’s Republic China*Ph.D. Candidate, Department Aerospace Control Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-5036Nanjing China†Professor, (Corresponding Author).Search author Xin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-6986University Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211‡Professor, Mechanical . Associate Fellow AIAA.Search authorPublished Online:11 Feb 2022https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G006237SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] S. Jiang X., “Review Prospect Guidance Mars Atmospheric Entry,” Progress in Sciences, Vol. 69, Aug. 2014, pp. 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.04.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Zheng Y. Cui H., “Mars Using a Sensitivity Method,” IEEE Transactions on Electronic Systems, 53, No. 4, 2017, 1672–1684. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2669618 Scholar[3] Roenneke A. J. Markl A., “Re-Entry Drag-vs-Energy Profile,” Journal Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 17, 5, 1994, 916–920. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21290 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Liu Lu P. Pan B., “Survey Convex Optimization Applications,” Astrodynamics, 1, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-017-0003-8 Scholar[5] Acikmese B. Ploen R., “Convex Programming Approach Powered Descent Landing,” 30, 2007, 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.27553 Scholar[6] Blackmore L., Scharf D. P., “Minimum-Landing-Error Powered-Descent Landing Optimization,” 33, 2010, 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47202 Scholar[7] Carson “Lossless Convexification the Soft Optimal Problem Non-Convex Bound Pointing Constraints,” Systems Technology, 21, 6, 2013, 2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2012.2237346 Scholar[8] Reynolds T. Szmuk M., Malyuta D., Mesbahi Açıkmeşe “Dual Quaternion-Based State-Triggered 43, 9, 2020, 1584–1599. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004536 Scholar[9] “Successive Real-Time Six-Degree-of-Freedom 8, 1399–1413. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004549 Scholar[10] Shen Z. “Entry Second-Order Cone Programming,” 39, 2, 2016, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001210 Scholar[11] “Solving Maximum-Crossrange via Line Search,” Science 47, Dec. 2015, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.008 Scholar[12] Zhao Song Z., “Reentry Waypoint No-Fly Zone Constraints Multiphase Acta Astronautica, 137, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.013 Scholar[13] Wang Grant M. J., “Constrained Planetary Sequential 40, 10, 2603–2615.https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002150 Scholar[14] “Optimal Trajectories Normal Load Analysis Hypersonic Glide Vehicles 87, April 2019, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.002 Scholar[15] Y., “Improved Algorithms Spacecraft Rockets, 57, 1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34640 Scholar[16] Sagliano Mooij E., Drag-Energy Pseudospectral 2018 AIAA Navigation, Conference, Paper 2018-1315, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1315 Scholar[17] Zhou He Zhang Tang G. Bao W., “Sequential Method Adaptive Mesh Refinement Problem,” 109, Feb. 2021, 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106374 Google Scholar[18] Yang Bai X. Baoyin “Rapid Generation Time-Optimal Asteroid 3, 628–641. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002170 Scholar[19] Pinson R. “Trajectory Design Employing Irregularly Shaped Asteroids,” 41, 2018, 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003045 Scholar[20] Yu C., “Efficient Reentry Chebyshev International Engineering, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1414279 Scholar[21] N. Wei Aircraft Engineering 91, 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-06-2018-0159 Scholar[22] “Exact Relaxation Flight Aerodynamically Controlled Missiles,” & 52, 1881–1892. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2016.150741 Scholar[23] “Fuel-Optimal Free Final-Time Path 172, July 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.03.025 Scholar[24] “Optimization Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Transfers 55, 586–598. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33995 Scholar[25] Mao Problems Its Convergence Properties,” 2016 55th Conference Decision (CDC), Inst. Electrical Electronics Engineers, New York, 3636–3641. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798816 Scholar[26] McDonald T., Rendezvous Unmanned Aerial Ground Vehicles,” 99, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105756 Scholar[27] Manrique Advances Univ. California, Irvine, CA, 2010. Scholar[28] Dueri State Ifac Papersonline, 50, 4063–4069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.789 Scholar[29] Dominguez Calabuig On-Board Abort Based Re-Entry,” Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021-0860, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0860 Scholar[30] Heidecker Macés Hernández Farì S., Schlotterer Woicke Seelbinder Dumont “Onboard Reusable Rockets: Aerodynamic 2021-0862, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0862 Scholar[31] Lofberg “YALMIP: A Toolbox Modeling MATLAB,” 2004 Robotics Automation (IEEE Cat. 04CH37508), Sept. 2004, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACSD.2004.1393890 Scholar[32] Andersen E. Roos C. Terlaky “On Implementing Primal-Dual Interior-Point Conic Quadratic Mathematical Programming, 95, 2003, 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-002-0349-3 Scholar[33] Patterson Rao V., “GPOPS—II: MATLAB Software Solving Multiple-Phase hp-Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Collocation Methods Sparse Nonlinear ACM Software, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2558904 Scholar[34] Robust Uncertainty Quantification,” 161, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.033 Scholar Previous article Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTrajectory planning satellite cluster reconfigurations sequential convex programming methodAerospace 120Six-Degree-of-Freedom Rocket Augmented Convex-Concave DecompositionMarco Sagliano, Ping Lu, David Stephan Theil19 January 2023Theoretical Fuel-Optimal ConstraintsSixiong You, Ran Dai Jeremy Rea1 November 2022 | 45, 12 What's Popular Volume Number 4April CrossmarkInformationCopyright © American Institute Inc. All rights reserved. requests copying permission reprint should be submitted CCC at www.copyright.com; employ eISSN 1533-3884 initiate your request. See also Rights Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesComputational Fluid DynamicsFlight MechanicsFluid DynamicsFluid Flow PropertiesNumerical AnalysisRunge-Kutta MethodsTerminal Velocity KeywordsBank AngleTrajectory OptimizationTerminal VelocityNonlinear ProgrammingAdaptive RefinementFlight AngleLift CoefficientFlight AltitudeNonlinear DynamicsTaylor SeriesAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported National Natural Foundation China (Grant 11672126) Qing Lan Project. Xu fully appreciate their financial support.PDF Received28 2021Accepted4 2022Published online11 February